Manchester and Associates

Pennsylvania Criminal & DUI Defense

Legal Blog

By

← DUI Portal

Five Common prescription drugs that lead to DUI charges in Pennsylvania

Most drivers think that having a prescription for their medication protect them from DUI charges. That is not correct and can get a driver in trouble.

Pennsylvania DUI statutes make it illegal to drive while impaired by a drug or combination of drugs. The word ‘drug’ in the statute is not limited to illegal drugs or even DEA scheduled drugs.

Here are Five common prescription drugs that can lead to being charged with a DUI:

  1. Adderall
  2. Xanex
  3. Ambien
  4. Vicodin
  5. Clarinex

Here is how a typical traffic stop can turn into a nightmare for a driver taking their prescription medication:

The driver is going down the street. Maybe they swerve a little. Fail to use a traffic signal, or one of their lights are not working. The police officer then pulls them over. The police officer either notices a prescription bottle or asks the driver if they are taking any medication. The driver, not knowing what these questions are designed to do, honestly tells the police officer they are taking their prescription medication. At this point it becomes a DUI stop.

The officer then asks the driver out of the car. Gives field sobriety tests. They May even calls in a drug DUI specialist that are called Drug Recognition Expert. and just like that, DUI charges are filed!

Generally, police officers do not consider that the person they are giving physical tests to is suffering from illness or injury. The biggest reason they do not is that the field sobriety tests that they are given have ABSOLUTELY NO leeway for people with physical injuries or illness. These tests have certain clues. If a clue is seen, it is scored. It does not matter if the physical disability, illness, or actual impairment cause the clue to be seen. If it is there it is scored. This is not an exercise where you want any points, let alone a lot of points.

I often see police camera video of field sobriety tests where the officer tells my client that they will take their physical disability into account in the tests. That is a total lie. The tests they give do not have any room for error because of physical disabilities, disease, or mental impairment from past brain injuries. I once had a DUI case where the police officer let my client do a field sobriety test with his cane. Talk about setting a person up for failure.

Here is a common trick that the police like to use. Once the driver tells the police officer about their physical disability or illness the officer then asks the driver if they feel they can do the test. Most drivers say yes and give the test a try. They have no clue what they are agreeing to. They often believe their disability will be considered. They are not. I have gone to the same exact training as the police officers get. Police officers are trained to know that physical problems can interfere with the tests and give false results and they must score a clue if it is found. But they never tell drivers this.

There are many possilble defenses to prescription medication DUI cases. People take medication because they are ill or injured. People who are ill or injured are most often worse off without their medication. However, police officers will charge a person with a DUI nonetheless, and then let the lawyers sort it out. Be aware of this.

If you take a prescription medication do not tell this to a police officer if asked. You have the right to remain silent. Do it. If you carry your prescription medication in your car do not put it in a place that can be seen or with your registration and insurance. Furthermore, if asked to step out of your vehicle and asked to take the field sobriety test, tell the officer because of your injury or illness you decline to take the test because of your injury. Do not let the officer intimidate you into doing it. Even if they threaten you with arrest, do not do it.

If the police officer is going to arrest you, then they are going to arrest you.

Do not give police evidence they can twist and use against you. Your defense lawyer and your freedom will thank you for it later.

By

← DUI Portal

Extradition and Pennsylvania

People freely cross state lines in the United States. When someone is wanted by law enforcement authorities across state lines, an arrest warrant is often issued. When a person in Pennsylvania is arrested and detained on behalf of another state, the process is called extradition. It is important for individuals and families to understand this often daunting and potentially confusing process.

An individual may find themselves arrested in Pennsylvania as a “fugitive from justice,” a term for someone who is wanted by a court and has not been properly before a judge. Two Federal laws control how extradition from one state to another: The Federal Fugitive Act, 18 U.S.C.A. § 3182; and the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act, 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9121 et. seq.

What Happens When Someone Is Arrested?

When an individual is arrested as a fugitive from justice, there are specific rules that must be followed by Pennsylvania and the demanding state. The outcome is that the fugitive is either extradited to the demanding state, or released from Pennsylvania custody.

After an individual is arrested on behalf of another state, Pennsylvania will notify the demanding state. The demanding state may request that Pennsylvania hold that individual and make arrangements to send the person to the other state. This is called a “detainer” and we refer to it as being “lodged” against the individual.

Under the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act, all arrests are treated the same. It does not matter if the arrest is for a criminal prosecution (when a person is facing new criminal charges) or based on a probation or parole violation (when a person is wanted for violating supervision from a prior criminal charge).

The Extradition Process in Pennsylvania

After an individual is retained on a fugitive warrant, the law requires that they be brought in front of a judge as soon as possible. There is then a hearing to tell the individual what they are charged with, to determine if the person arrested is actually the person charged, and to set bail if appropriate. In Pennsylvania, individuals are entitled to bail for all cases except those punishable by life in prison or death.

A “Governor’s Warrant” will then be requested by the demanding state. Pennsylvania’s governor then issues a governor’s warrant. This grants the court in Pennsylvania the authority to decide whether to extradite the individual.

The governor’s warrant must arrive within 30 days of the fugitive’s arrest. If it does not, the individual can be detained for a further 60 days. These time periods start when the individual is arrested in Pennsylvania. Individuals should also be aware that the lodging of a detainer is treated as a separate arrest from the initial arrest under the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act.

After the governor’s warrant is issued, the court will schedule a hearing. At that time, the judge must inform the fugitive from justice of the accusations against them, the demand for their return to the demanding state, and the individual’s right to test the legality of the arrest. Many individuals waive these rights and consent to their return to the demanding state.

Fighting an extradition request is a difficult process. An experienced criminal defense attorney will challenge whether the individual was arrested legally; will challenge the validity of the demand from the requesting state; and will challenge whether a crime occurred in the first place. The District Attorney as the prosecutor for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania must prove to a prima facie level that all of the requirements for an extradition have been met. Prima facie proof means that the alleged fact is more likely to be true than not.

If you or a loved one is facing possible extradition in Pennsylvania, contact Manchester and Associates today.

About Us

Manchester and Associates is a law firm dedicated to criminal defense that operates throughout the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania since 1978.  5-star ratings prove what our firm is all about:  making sure that the best possible outcome for our clients is achieved. We use a teamwork approach in all our major cases and one of our team members is a former District Attorney. This gives us an advantage of reviewing your case from both the prosecution and defense side. Our lawyers have handled multiple simple assault cases across the state of Pennsylvania. Let our collective trial experience earned over several decades aid your defense.

By

← DUI Portal

Not Very Neighborly: Simple Assault Charges filed in Centre County

Last month a Bellefonte man was charged with simple assault. It stemmed from a fight with his neighbor. 

Most neighbors resolve their disputes peacefully. As a Bellefonte man found out last month when he was charged with simple assault after a fight with his neighbor, when violence between neighbors does break out, criminal charges often follow.

Simple assault is one of the most commonly charged offenses in Pennsylvania because so many things can be considered assaults.

In Pennsylvania, the Crimes Code at  18 PA C.S.A. 2701 says simple assault is an intentional attempt to cause another person bodily harm. You can also be charged with simple assault for causing someone harm through negligence (such as accidentally stabbing someone with a knife) as well as using a deadly weapon negligently.

Simple assault does not require an injury. If one person attempts to hurt another, such as by throwing a punch that misses, a simple assault has occurred.

Although the name implied this is a basic crime, there is nothing “simple” about simple assault. The penalties for these crimes are very serious.  Although it is always a misdemeanor in Pennsylvania, there are multiple degrees of simple assault, which carry increasingly serious possible penalties. They are as follows:

  • Third Degree Assault – up to one year in jail and a $2,500 fine
  • Second Degree Simple Assault – up to two years in jail and a $5,000 fine
  • First Degree Misdemeanor – up to five years in jail and a $10,000 fine.  If the offender is over 21 years old and the victim is under 12 years old, charges usually default to first degree simple assault.

A simple assault charge goes on your permanent criminal record. You will need an experienced and skilled attorney if you are charged with these crimes.  Manchester and Associates has had many favorable verdicts when it comes to simple assault and we can help.

About Us

Manchester and Associates is a law firm dedicated to criminal defense that operates throughout the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania since 1978.  5-star ratings prove what our firm is all about:  making sure that the best possible outcome for our clients is achieved. We use a teamwork approach in all our major cases and one of our team members is a former District Attorney. This gives us an advantage of reviewing your case from both the prosecution and defense side. Our lawyers have handled multiple simple assault cases across the state of Pennsylvania. Let our collective trial experience earned over several decades aid your defense.

By

← DUI Portal

DO NOT TALK TO THE POLICE. NO MATTER WHAT.

From the desk of Brian Manchester, Esq:

Upon first meeting with a client and hearing their story, the first question I ask is “have spoken to the police?” If they tell me that they have, I then ask “have you told the police what you told me? Often enough, the answer to both of these questions is yes.

When I hear a yes to either or both of those questions, I cringe. Why? Because talking to the police gives control of my client’s story to the police. They may have heard something wrong. They may have written a note about what my client said that was incorrect. They may misperceive what my clint said – or, in rare cases, outright lie about it. 

Our founding fathers were very smart. They created the Fifth Amendment to the constitution for a reason. Please follow it.

When my clients remain silent, we then control the narrative. We get to control what we say, when and to whom. We can decide to say nothing at all. It gives my clients and me the power to investigate leads, gather evidence, and talk to experts first before the police talk to them. There is EVERY advantage to remaining silent and NO DISADVANTAGES to it.

Client’s often ask me something like this: “Well if I don’t talk to them. They will think I am guilty!” The police are speaking to you because they suspect or believe that you might have done something illegal. Police are not bored. They don’t go around talking to random people about crimes. If an officer suspects you then they want to talk to you. DO NOT do it. Do not give them an advantage. You can’t talk your way out of anything. Being questioned by an officer is a stressful thing. Think back to times in your life when you were stressed. Do you express yourself clearly when you are stressed? Do you get all of the details right when you are stressed? Do you stutter or trip over your words when you are stressed? These are all things that you do not want to do when you speak to police officers.

Once I represented a man charged with murder and the prosecutor wanted the death penalty. The police never could have charged my client without him giving a statement to them. Fortunately, I was able to have the death penalty thrown out before trial and at trial he was convicted of third rather than first-degree murder. My client talking to the police almost cost him his life. Do not do it. Also do not lie and try to talk yourself out of something. That just makes it worse and if you have not done anything, it makes you look guilty and makes the defense of your case extremely hard.

          There are many reasons why remaining silent is the only way to go. I could go on for pages. However, in all my years of practice, I have never found a better explanation than that offered by the video below. This is a lecture given by James Duane, a professor from Regent University School of Law. Please watch the whole thing:. It may be the best and most helpful video you have ever watched.

By

← DUI Portal

HOMICIDE BY VEHICLE WHILE DUI

CHARGES FILED IN MCKEAN COUNTY

An Olean, NY woman was charged with Homicide by Vehicle while DUI and related charges following a vehicle accident that occurred in January of 2021 in Ceres Township, McKean County. Among the charges filed was possession of marijuana.

The news report said that the woman charged was taken to a hospital in Olean, NY after the accident. That is a significant fact in this case. It is significant because her blood was likely drawn at that hospital. NY does not have the same laws that Pennsylvania has relating to the drawing of a blood test for legal purposes. Furthermore, hospital blood tests generally use an enzymatic method that does not comply with forensic standards. If marijuana was found in her blood or urine and the testing was done at the hospital, then under Pennsylvania law, the test results will not be admissible.

The reason urine test results are not admissible is because in 2016 urine was eliminated as a matrix that could be tested when Section 1547 was amended by the Pennsylvania. Furthermore, even if blood was tested, hospitals are not approved for testing for drugs. Only forensic labs, and only forensic labs certified by the Department of Health, can test for drugs and have their results be accepted in Pennsylvania Courts as evidence. The blood test that is used to find alcohol is also fraught with issues.

Several years ago, this firm handled a DUI in McKean County where our client was taken to a hospital in Buffalo and his blood was drawn there. The blood was eventually shipped from the hospital to a Pennsylvania State Police Lab for testing. We found that the blood tubes were not forensic tubes and they had no preservatives in them. That and there were chain of custody issues and other problems with the testing in that case. The blood alcohol content was alleged to be over .28. Because of the issues in the testing my team and I found, the case settled very favorably with our client getting to keep his driver’s license and his salesman job.

One of the most powerful pieces of evidence in a Homicide by Vehicle While DUI case is the blood test. Every aspect of the test should be investigated and attacked if feasible. Just because the government says they have a test results showing alcohol, drugs, or both, does not mean the test results gets admitted or is as good as they say.

About Us

Manchester and Associates is a law firm dedicated to criminal defense that operates throughout the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania since 1978.  Our 5-star ratings prove what our firm is all about:  making sure that the best possible outcome for our clients is achieved. Our team is comprised of lawyers who are specifically trained as to how blood is tested and the defenses to those tests. One of our team members is a member of the American Chemical Society and is a Certified Lawyer-Scientist through them. He is also a national lecturer on blood and drug testing. We are the law firm that teaches other lawyers how to properly defend DUI and Homicide by Vehicle While DUI cases. If you find yourself charged with Homicide by Vehicle While DUI and related charges, please call our team right away for a free consultation.

By

← DUI Portal

TEXAS MAN CHARGED WITH HOMICIDE IN UNION COUNTY

This week the Pennsylvania State Police announced the arrest of Travey Rollins for the murder of a woman whose body was found alongside Interstate 80 last week near Milton, Pennsylvania. Currently the State Police say he is charged with Homicide.

In Pennsylvania, Homicide is a general charge. At the time of arraignment, the prosecutor must pick a specific category of Homicide. In Pennsylvania the specific charges under the general category of homicide are First-Degree Murder, Second-Degree Murder, Third-Degree Murder, Voluntary Manslaughter, and Involuntary Manslaughter.

First-Degree murder in Pennsylvania requires a prosecutor to prove a person committed a premeditated, unlawful killing of a human being. The time required for the plan to kill can be brief unlike in TV shows where they show a person lotting to kill another for a long time. This charge carries automatic life in prison and possibly the death penalty if an aggravated factor is proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

Second-Degree murder, also called Felony Murder, is the act of killing another person during the commission of a felony such as robbery, arson, kidnapping, drug dealing. Second-Degree Murder applies to both the principle and any accomplice. The typical scenario given is the driver of a getaway car for a robbery can be found guilty of second-degree murder when one of his gang kills the bank guard and he/she does not. The penalty is life in jail.

Third-Degree murder is all other kinds of murder. It requires malice but not the intent to kill. It can be described as killing someone but not planning the killing and not done while in the process of committing another felony. The maximum penalty is 40 years.

Voluntary Manslaughter is defined as the unlawful killing of another person without legal justification, if at the time of the act, the individual is acting under a sudden and intense passion or under serious provocation. Legal justification is a defense. Self-defense is legal justification. The typical example of Voluntary Manslaughter is when a person catches their spouse with another person and they kill them or when someone dies in a fight where the person who did the killing was provoked by the deceased. The maximum penalty is 20 years.

Then there is Involuntary Manslaughter. This version of homicide is the only misdemeanor. All other versions of homicide are felonies. It is defined as the killing of another person that resulted from an unlawful act which was committed in a reckless or grossly negligent manner. The maximum punishment for this offense is five years in jail.

The facts that are known about this case are interesting but by no means does the prosecutor have an open and shut case. They must prove the intent of the person accused as well as the murder occurring in Union County and many other things. Murder cases are complex, full of emotion, and very evidence intensive. Having tried several murder cases across the state, I can say that just because someone is charged with homicide does not automatically mean they will get convicted and a life sentence.

About Us

Manchester and Associates is a law firm dedicated to criminal defense that operates throughout the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania since 1978.  5-star ratings prove what our firm is all about:  making sure that the best possible outcome for our clients is achieved. We use a teamwork approach in all of our major cases and one of our team members is a former District Attorney. This gives us an advantage of reviewing your case from both the prosecution and defense side. Our lawyers have handled multiple murder cases across the state of Pennsylvania. Let our collective trial experience earned over several decades aid your defense.

By Leave a Comment

← DUI Portal

CLEARFIELD DOCTOR CHARGED WITH PRESCRIPTION DRUG DUI

Recently, a doctor in Clearfield County was charged with a DUI based on her use of prescription medication.

The doctor is accused of having the prescription drug Gabapentin in her system.  Gabapentin, which has the brand name Neurontin, is a schedule V (five) drug. It is used to treat seizures and neuropathic pain which are often caused by diabetic neuropathy.

A prescription drug DUI is treated at the top level of punishment just like when someone has a blood alcohol content of greater than .16. It is not right that a prescription drug DUI is treated so harshly in Pennsylvania, but it is and that is why an aggressive defense is necessary. A first offense DUI based on prescription drugs can result in 72 hours to 6 months in jail plus one year’s license loss and in the case of a doctor, possible loss of the license to practice medicine. If it is a second or third offense, then the punishments get far worse.

There are multiple defenses to prescription drug DUI cases: 

  • The first defense is explaining to a judge or jury the underlying medical condition the person charged has and the physical and mental effects the disease or injury has on them.
  • The second defense is to then point out to the judge or jury why the medication is necessary to help the person charged and how they are actually worse off by not taking the drug. People take medication because they are sick or injured. It is not illegal to drive while sick or injured. A lot of people with chronic pain and mental conditions are not capable of safely driving WITHOUT their medication but are fine when they take it.
  • The third defense is pointing out that Standardized Field Sobriety Tests have never been scientifically validated to determine if a person is impaired by prescription medication.
  • The fourth defense is that many of the physical signs that police officers say are indicators of impairment are, in fact, physical and mental side effects of the underlying injury or disease.

There are many other defenses to these cases and more so than in alcohol related DUI cases.

About Us

Manchester and Associates is a law firm dedicated to criminal defense that operates throughout the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania since 1978.  5-star ratings prove what our firm is all about:  making sure that the best possible outcome for our clients is achieved.  If you find yourself charged with a DUI due to prescription drugs, contact us today.

By

← DUI Portal

Repetition Compulsion

What is Repetition Compulsion and its Uses in Mitigating Sentences in Child Pornography Cases?

Does history repeat itself?   The simple, as well as sad answer, in the case of many individuals who have been charged with criminal offenses, is YES!!   Many individuals who find themselves entangled in the criminal justice system, whether they are juveniles or adults, have sometimes endured chaotic and tortuous developmental histories replete with emotional, physical and/or sexual mistreatment and abuse.  The impact of these experiences can, and in many cases does, produce lasting and often poorly understood symptoms and behaviors which can lead to allegations of criminal behavior resulting in charges, possible incarceration, and fallout that can negatively affect future employment, standing in the community, relationships with others, as well as the individual’s self-perception.  An important aspect of criminal defense and forensic psychology is to untangle these historical intrusions into normal development and bring these to light in the context of criminal allegations.  It is important for the courts to know the accused as more than a litany of charges and what he/she has been accused of.  

An aspect of the above is the concept of “repetition compulsion”.  The impact of traumatic events has been identified since the late 1800’s, i.e., well over the past 125 years.  Our understanding of repetition phenomena has been developed, revised and expanded so that we now have a much greater understanding of how trauma can have an impact on an individual’s behavior, emotions, and also their physiological and neuroendocrinological make-up. Compulsive behavioral repetition can take place without conscious knowledge or connection made by the individual.  And, very importantly, in a behavioral re-enactment of trauma, the individual may assume a role in which they may again be the victim, or conversely, the victimizer.  Behavioral re-enactment can lead to, or cause, harm to others/violence, self-destructive acts, and also re-victimization or placing oneself in harm’s way.  Often people who have been traumatized return to that which is familiar, i.e., familiar patterns of behavior, even if what they do is painful. A part of what can motivate a re-enactment or repetition of the same or similar behavior is an attempt to remember, integrate and heal from a traumatic experience.  Re-enactments as noted above can stem from, and be evidenced in, a variety of different ways.  It is the maladaptive ways that often come to the attention of others, including the legal authorities.  Our goal as criminal defense lawyers is to bring this out to the court and prosecutors in the proper cases. If possible, use forensic psychologists to examine and elucidate any such occurrences of trauma in our clients so we can educate the legal system to connect our client’s actions to past trauma to their seemingly unfathomable criminal behaviors. 

This is a key concept for lawyers who represent citizens in child pornography cases to understand. Studies have shown that there is a large percentage of people who consume child porn who were victims of sexual abuse themselves. The consumption of child pornography can be a way for victims of sexual abuse to relieve their past victimization and try to overcome it. So, when people are arrested for this for child pornography they should have a thorough workup done and if past abuse is found this should be brought to the attention of the court and prosecutors as a way of mitigating punishment.