Do I Have The Right To Record Public Officials (Aka The Police) In Public?

August 28, 2017By Brian Manchester

This is a question that has been circulating around the country for some time now and we still do not have a completely clear answer. The Courts that are mainly dealing with this issue are the Federal Courts. To understand what is happening here you have to have a basic understanding of the way the Federal Courts are set up. First there are 94 total district courts scattered across the US is in several US territories. Then there are 12 regional circuit courts of appeal for the district courts. Then there is the highest Court in the United States the US Supreme Court. Pennsylvania is part of the 3rd circuit court which also included New Jersey and Delaware.

In addition to all the Federal Courts state Courts have been answering this questions as well. However Federal Law controls state law. Thus if a Federal Court rules one way they will influence the states that are within its circuit.

The Eight Circuit is the most recent of the Circuits to issue a ruling on whether or not you can record the police and any public official in public spaces. The ruling by the Eight Circuit was not in line with the rules already issued by First, Third, Fifth, Seventh, Ninth, and Eleventh Circuits. All of these Circuits ruled that public officials can be filmed in public spaces because there is no expectation of privacy when you are in public. The Eighth Circuit just ruled against this.

Now this creates an issue with competing rulings between the Circuits. Should the Eighth Circuit not reconsider and change their decision this would be a ripe case to take to the US Supreme Court to hopefully get a definitive answer on this question. However there is no guarantee the US Supreme Court will even accept the case or if they accept the case they could side step the real issue and rule in some other means.

The Third Circuit which includes Pennsylvania stated the following when addressing this issue.

Judge Thomas Ambro agreed that both Defendants held a constitutional right to record the police—a right that officers violated in both instances. “The First Amendment protects the public’s right of access to information about their officials’ public activities,” Judge Ambro wrote. This access “is particularly important because it leads to citizen discourse” on public and political issues, the most highly valued First Amendment activity. Thus, the government is constitutionally barred from “limiting the stock of information from which members of the public may draw.”

The Eight Circuit which includes North Dakota, South Dakota, Minnesota, Iowa, Nebraska, Missouri, and Arkansas stated the complete opposite as the other six Circuits ruled. Stating “he has no constitutional right to videotape any public proceedings he wishes to.” And “[N]either the public nor the media has a First Amendment right to videotape, photograph, or make audio recordings of government proceedings that are by law open to the public.”

At least for now in the Third Circuit you do have a right under the First Amendment to record the police and other public officials when they are out in the public.

It is extremely important to contact an experienced law firm right away if you or someone you know is facing criminal charges in Pennsylvania. If you, your son, daughter, or loved one in Pennsylvania has been arrested for a crime in state or federal court in Pennsylvania you need legal representation. Here at Manchester and Associates we represent people across the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. For a free consultation, we can be contacted at 1-800-243-4878.

Posted in: Civil Rights

Tags: Aka The Police, Criminal Defense, Record Public Officials,

Share this Article

About the Author

Brian Manchester is the owner of Manchester and Associates in Bellefonte, Pennsylvania. His law firm practices DUI and Criminal Defense exclusively throughout the entire state of Pennsylvania in both state and federal court. He has a team of two other lawyers with a combined 50 years of trial and courtroom experience are also trained in science and many other skills that are relevant to criminal defense to include the psychology of persuasion as well. One of his associates is a former District Attorney (chief prosecutor) in central Pennsylvania.   Mr. Manchester and his team routinely handle serious felony cases including murder, manslaughter, sex crimes, complex financial crimes, and serious assaults. A large part of Mr. Manchester’s practice is the defense of alcohol and drug-based DUI offenses as well as drug cases using science and analytical chemistry. Mr. Manchester has training as a Standardized Field Sobriety Testing Instructor. He is one of a handful of Certified Lawyer-Scientists as recognized by the American Chemical Society in the United States. He is a member of NCDD and is a Founding Member of DUIDLA. He is also a member of the American Chemical Society with over 170,000 members across the world. To date, he is the only practicing criminal defense lawyer to belong to the Society of Forensic Toxicologist where he is an Associate Member. Mr. Manchester speaks nationally on the topic of blood and drug testing for alcohol as well as the metrological (measurement uncertainty) in forensic testing.

Leave a Reply

CONTACT US
EMERGENCY CONSULTATION 24/7

(888) 994-7616 [cForm]

Client Testimonials

  • “Mr. Manchester is the lawyer I would hire if accused of DWI. He is concerned for his clients and aggressively defends their cases. He has completed the most rigorous training to be one of the best DWI lawyers in the State. His determination and knowledge will serve you well when he is your attorney.”
  • “I endorse this lawyer. Mr. Manchester is well versed with the evidential pitfalls of hospital blood testing. With this knowledge, he has been able to effectively represent those accused of alcohol related offenses. Recently, Mr. Manchester has provided me with assistance on a complex blood analysis case.”
  • “I am both surprised and proud to be one of the first lawyers to highly recommend Brian as a criminal defense and DUI lawyer. Brian’s knowledge of criminal defense, and especially in the area of DUI, is unmatched. Not only does Brian possess a great working knowledge of the law, he has also dedicated himself to the underlying science necessary to successfully defend DUI and criminal cases involving blood test results. Brian is committed to excellence and receives my recommendation without reservation to those looking for a knowledgeable and committed criminal defense or DUI attorney.”
  • “Attorney Manchester is well-known for his strong work ethic. He is the type of attorney that you would like to have involved in your case. Known as a person who stands up for principle, Attorney Manchester has the guts that is needed (but sadly is missing in a lot of criminal defense attorneys) to defend the citizen accused. He is certainly not afraid to defend people who have been accused by the government of being in violation of the law. His favorite two words seems to be “Prove it!””
  • “Brian Manchester is a knowledgeable, dedicated attorney, with the skill and ability to successfully defend citizens who are accused of driving under the influence. I highly recommend Brian.”
Read More >>

What Law Enforcement Says about Brian Manchester


Topics

search

Recent Entries

ROR Bail What is Institutional Sexual Assault and its Punishments? Teen Sexting & Child Pornography Charges
[BdForm type="1" mod="desk"]